Song 47:
"Ain't Nothing Like the Real Thing" by Marvin Gaye & Tammi Terrell
Peak: 8
Year: 1968
Year end position: 57
Alphabetical Songs by Artist: 2/25
Chronological Songs by Artist: 13/25
Video?: No
Wikipedia?: Yes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ain't_Nothing_Like_the_Real_Thing
Spotify?: Yes
If you are following along, you may be
thinking, “Hey, didn’t we just have a song by Marvin Gaye and Tammi
Terrell”? Why yes, we did. Just a week ago, we had “Ain’t No
Mountain High Enough”, which was our first two-artist song. Back then, I
expressed how surprised I was that that song only reached #19, given its
popularity since. Apparently, America was more primed to accept the
Marvin and Tammi a year later when this song came around because it made it all
the way to #8. This was the 4th duet between Marvin and Tammi to
hit the charts from 1967-1968.
I was curious about the quick
turnaround between an artists first and second songs alphabetically, since
Marvin only has 7 songs between his first and second. I wanted to know if
that was a record. After some searching, it turns out that it is
not. There are two artists that have their first and second songs appear
consecutively. Enrique Iglesias’s first two songs, “Bailamos” and
“Bailando” are back to back in alphabetical order, and Dickie Goodman’s “Flying
Saucer” and “Flying Saucer the 2nd” are also back to back. The
last one is a bit of a cheat, but it technically counts. So, pretty quick
for Marvin, but record-setting quick.
The similarities between “Ain’t Nothing
Like the Real Thing” and “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough” aren’t limited to the
singers and similar title structure. They both were written by the same
writing team of Ashford & Simpson. If you remember that post, “Ain’t
No Mountain High Enough” was to be their gateway song to Motown records.
I’d say they accomplished their goal and established themselves as formidable
hit makers.
I was searching the internet to see if
there was a connection between this song and the Coca-Cola advertising campaign
of Coke as “The Real Thing”. I found out that that particular campaign
started for Coke in 1969, just one year after this song charted, but I couldn’t
find anything that said that one was influenced by the other. It seems
unlikely to me that they weren’t, since the phrasing is almost exactly the
same. It’s entirely possible that I wasn’t looking hard enough for that
link.
I know I’ve said in the past that a big
part of the reason why I like following the charts is what they can tell you
about the times when the songs came out. This song is a good example of
that. There’s nothing specifically dated about this song, like references
to things that no longer exist. The message of the song is pretty
universal to any time period. The thing that makes this song somewhat
indicative of the times is if you think of the theme of the song in the context
of the Vietnam War.
The song is about two people, a man and
a woman that are separated. The first verse is sung by Tammi Terrell, and
she is explaining how she has a picture of her love. Marvin Gaye comes in
and he has the letters that she wrote to him. They both come to the same
conclusion that these things are just poor substitutes for the actual
person. This theme is repeated for the rest of the song. In the
last verse, Marvin is talking about his memories and saying “I’m well aware
nothin’ can take the place of your being there.”
If you put this song in the context of
the Vietnam War, it makes the song more poignant. It’s not hard to
imagine a soldier in the field reading a letter from his girlfriend, or that
same girl looking at a picture and longing for the real person to be
there. Another thing that makes this song a little dated is that modern
technology has made it much, much easier to stay in contact, even from half
away around the world. That doesn’t take anything away from the heartfelt
emotion of this song in my opinion.
This song really works well as a duet
between a man and a woman. I’ve heard that there is a version that Donny
and Marie Osmand sang. That sounds a little strange to me, as I don’t
really feel the brother / sister dynamic happening in this song.
No comments:
Post a Comment